Those individuals who refuse to receive vaccines often obtain views that are obstructed by the opinions of the people who surround them. Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Emmy-award winning chief medical correspondent explains in a CNN report that, "science often loses the zeal argument to ideology". People hear by word of mouth that a vaccination could potentially have adverse effects and this fear becomes greater than the benefits these medical innovations could offer. Gupta explains that most of these fears are not based off of fact, but on assumption. Many individuals have not personally witnessed a vaccine produce an adverse effect, but have heard of a friend of a friend who has possibly had a reaction to the vaccine. Gupta urges readers to take vaccines not as a matter of opinion,but as a matter of fact. To support this claim, Gupta explains through several statistics that vaccines are not as harmful as people may conceive; in reference to the measles vaccine he explains,"that you are 100 times more likely to be struck by lightning than to have a serious allergic to the vaccine". Gupta claims that if more individuals were genuinely educated on the facts concerning vaccines, they will be more apt to receive them and acquire their benefits.
Gupta further explains that individuals should not fear vaccines simply due to the potential stories of adverse effects. He expands upon his views through a quote from David Katz, a representative from Yale School of Public Health, who states, "it makes no more sense to rant against vaccines because you heard of someone who might have had an adverse reaction than to stop walking because you heard about a pedestrian struck by a car". People should not fear the unknown simply due to fears of possible faults. The advantages to vaccines offer benefits that exceed any adverse effects that may occur. With any situation, there will be some sort of fear of failure, however,we know that, in reference to the quote, that it is far more practical to keep walking, as there is little chance that most individuals who walk will be struck by a car. In the same way, there is little chance that vaccines will fail to serve their purpose, therefore individuals should keep in mind the benefits they produce.
In the United States, every citizen has the freedom to choose whether they wish to receive a vaccine or not. Those who choose not to receive vaccines must think of the people their choice is affecting as well. Their children, their co-workers, their family, the people they come in contact with daily could all become victims of their freedom of choice. If this individual happens to contact the disease, they put their loved ones at risk of contracting the disease as well, leading to possible death and and outbreak of the disease. Vaccines are an innovative technology that allow people to avoid contracting possibly lethal diseases that would be otherwise incurable. If we have the ability to reduce the chance of death caused by illness, why shouldn't we utilize it? Taking into consideration the facts and benefits concerning vaccines, it would be a logical decision for individuals to support the administration of vaccines to protect their lives and the lives of their loved ones.
Sabrina, I thought this was an excellent topic to discuss because of the growing concerns and issues over vaccinations within our country at this time. I have been interested in this topic and trying to keep up with it ever since there was the measles outbreak in California that spread to other surrounding states. I agree with your thought regarding the fact that if we have the resources, which are in this case vaccines, to reduce the chance of death, then we should take advantage of that. The benefits of vaccines outweigh the negative effects, which should be more than enough reason to get vaccinated. I really liked the comparison Katz made between a pedestrian getting hit by a car and a patient experiencing the adverse effects of a vaccination. It is very rare for either of those things to happen, so when it does people typically continue doing that; however, some tend to be more skeptical about vaccinations. Another side to the vaccinations that many people leave out is the fact that vaccinations have helped get rid of many other diseases that the U.S. has encountered. An example of a vaccine that was once required, but is no longer required is the smallpox vaccine. After watching the news on multiple occasions when the topic of vaccines were being discussed, I learned that the smallpox vaccine is no longer administered because with the vaccine the people were able to completely eradicate the disease. The vaccination is no longer needed because the disease no longer exists here, and that is all thanks to the vaccine that was administered at the time. The U.S., however, is prepared if there were to be a rare outbreak of the disease, but they do not see that happening anytime soon. If people take this fact into consideration, as well, then maybe they will be encouraged to get their routine vaccines. If the people, particularly parents, in the U.S. continue with vaccinations now, then maybe the diseases will no longer exist. If this were to be the case, parents will be able to trust and accept the fact that diseases of today may not be around to effect their grandchildren and the future generations of our country, just like the case with the smallpox. I hope some people take this thought into consideration, and I plan to keep following the news to see what our country will further decide to do regarding the issue of vaccinations.
ReplyDelete